Sexual assault is a criminal offense. It is also a gender subject. Till the lads holding the reins of energy get that underneath their belts, it’s going to be usual usual.

Mate? Tick. Thrice, in reality. The Sharks? Tick. Sporty T-shirt, weekend dad cap, laconic type? Tick, tick, tick.
On the weekend Scott Morrison despatched a jovial message of congrats to Phil “Buzz” Rothfield at The Each day Telegraph for notching up 45 years masking footy.
Maaaaaate.
The PM is way extra comfy ticking these blokey containers than he’s coping with the alleged rape(s) of ladies. Within the roiling wake of Brittany Higgins’ allegation that she was raped by a Coalition staffer within the hallowed confines of Parliament Home, The Australian on the weekend revealed one other alleged assault by the identical man. And this morning a 3rd.
Morrison has pledged to make Parliament Home as secure as
potential. Will he? Or is he simply ticking extra containers?
He says the ministers and employees who “had data of this matter” did the proper issues. There’s an inquiry underneath means that you just wouldn’t wish to “pre-judge”. The occasions are sickening; they’re not confined to the Coalition; not even confined to parliament; we’re going to do all we will.
Disaster comms 101: present empathy, deflect, decide to motion. Tick, tick, tick.




That dedication to “guarantee that this office is as secure as potential” is superficially noble, however basically one other tick-a-box train. It’s bullshit.
What Morrison has dedicated to is but extra critiques. 4 of them. And Morrison has unofficially endorsed a revolutionary complaints dealing with course of — one which doesn’t truly contain the totally unprotected parliamentary employees complaining to the very individuals who maintain their fragile careers of their party-loyal fingers.
There are a number of layers of bullshit to sift by way of right here.
The murky waters of who knew what, and when.
The darkish sediment of Canberra tradition, and the way a lot but
one other inquiry can settle it.
And the foundational bullshit: will the federal authorities truly do every part it may possibly to ensure the office is “as secure as potential”?
The hazard is that it’s simply creating extra containers to tick. An unbiased physique? Even one thing resembling an HR division to which assaulted employees can flip? Higher processes (any processes!) for folks to comply with when the proverbial hits? Clearer insurance policies (within the post-bonk ban period) that make it somewhat extra apparent that you just actually shouldn’t rape folks?
If all of those containers are ticked, they’ll simply deliver parliament into line with most companies and establishments. And we all know that doing all that’s nonetheless not sufficient to make workplaces “as secure as potential”.
To fulfil that promise, a tectonic shift is critical: tackling male privilege. Not very comfy territory for male politicians.
Serendipitously, two researchers from the College of New South Wales, postdoctoral fellow Natalie Galea and Scientia Professor Louise Chappell, printed a paper final week that checked out male-dominated workplaces and the facility of male privilege (abstract in The Dialog right here). They picked the development trade and the political sector as prime examples of sausage fests.
Chappell and Galea flip the story of ladies’s drawback and powerlessness into one about males’s benefit and powerfulness. They argue that it’s fairly clear and straightforward to implement “formal” guidelines and practices akin to precise HR processes, for instance.
It’s a lot tougher to cope with “casual” establishments. The
day by day shit. The privilege.
“The primary vital characteristic of privilege is its invisibility to those that get pleasure from it and, like gender, it’s framed earlier than we all know it … Males have a tendency to not see their gender privilege; whites have a tendency to not see their race privilege; ruling-class members have a tendency to not see their class privilege,” they wrote.
For instance, you possibly can have a proper non-discrimination coverage and argue that preselections are based mostly on “advantage”, after which shrug your shoulders when the casual and discriminatory coverage retains delivering males into secure seats.
“The male privilege in Australia’s parliament has given its members such a way of exceptionalism, they appear to suppose the requirements of the company workplace … shouldn’t apply to their office,” they wrote.
Some stats. A significant report into neighborhood attitudes discovered nearly one in three younger males thought girls who’d been raped had led a person on after which regretted it, and simply over one in three thought it was “pure for a person to wish to seem answerable for his accomplice in entrance of his male mates”.
One in eight thought if a girls was raped whereas drunk or on medication she was a minimum of partly accountable.
One in 4 thought girls preferred being “persistently pursued,
even when they don’t seem to be ”.
Based on the Australian Institute of Well being and Welfare, girls are much more probably than males to have been assaulted, and the perpetrators are overwhelmingly male.
It is a gender subject.
If Morrison is critical about doing every part potential to make parliament — and Australia — a safer place, he has to withstand the nebulous and nuanced actuality of male privilege.
It’s potential that if he truly used that phrase heads would explode all around the backbench, and there could be some splatters within the entrance. And that is the bloke who used an Worldwide Girls’s Day occasion to say: “We wish to see girls rise … We don’t wish to see girls rise solely on the idea of others doing worse.”
Is the prime minister actually going to do every part potential to make parliament as secure as potential? I name bullshit. He may simply do sufficient to deliver it into line with the remainder of Australia.
Tory Shepherd is an Adelaide-based freelance journalist. After finding out anthropology she joined The Advertiser, the place she nonetheless writes an everyday column. Her work additionally seems on ABC Adelaide and in Cosmos journal.
If you happen to or somebody you already know is impacted by sexual assault or violence, name 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732, or go to 1800RESPECT.org.au.




Don’t get Zucked. Get information straight from the supply.
They weren’t bluffing. Fb flicked the change and Australia woke as much as a newsfeed with out information.
So the place do you come to grasp and discuss in regards to the information now? Come to our place.
Get a 12 months of Crikey for simply $99 — often $199 — if you subscribe immediately with the promocode DONTGETZUCKED.
Hurry supply ends midnight this Sunday.
Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey
JOIN NOW